pISSN 3022-6783
eISSN 3022-7712

View

Article View

Clin Transplant Res 2024; 38(2): 71-89

Published online June 30, 2024

https://doi.org/10.4285/ctr.24.0006

© The Korean Society for Transplantation

Polyomavirus nephropathy: diagnosis, histologic features, and differentiation from acute rejection

Cynthia C. Nast

Department of Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Correspondence to: Cynthia C. Nast
Department of Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Room 8612, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
E-mail: Cynthia.Nast@cshs.org

Received: January 26, 2024; Revised: February 28, 2024; Accepted: March 20, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Polyomaviruses, particularly BK virus, are ubiquitous latent infections that may reactivate with immunosuppression during kidney transplantation, resulting in polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN). The levels of viruria and viremia serve as tools for screening and making a presumptive diagnosis of PVN, respectively, while a definitive diagnosis requires a kidney biopsy. There are histologic classifications of PVN based on the extent of tubular cell viral infection, interstitial fibrosis, and interstitial inflammation. These classifications correlate to some degree with graft function and loss, aiding in determining treatment efficacy and prognostication. PVN has histologic overlap with acute cell-mediated rejection, making the differential diagnosis challenging, although there are suggestive features for these different causes of graft dysfunction. This article reviews the diagnosis, histologic findings, and classifications of PVN, and discusses how to differentiate viral nephropathy from acute rejection.

Keywords: Polyomavirus, BK virus, Viremia, Kidney biopsy, Graft rejection

HIGHLIGHTS
  • A presumptive diagnosis of BK virus nephropathy is based on plasma viral copy numbers.

  • A proven diagnosis of BK virus nephropathy requires viral identification in a kidney biopsy.

  • Histologic classifications of nephropathy include the extent of infection, fibrosis, and inflammation.

  • Histologic classifications of BK virus nephropathy have some correlation with outcomes.

  • Differentiating acute cellular rejection from BK virus nephropathy is challenging.