pISSN 3022-6783
eISSN 3022-7712

View

Article View

Korean J Transplant 2021; 35(Suppl 1): S10-S10

Published online October 7, 2021

https://doi.org/10.4285/ATW2021.OR-1095

© The Korean Society for Transplantation

Lung transplantation for patients with severe COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome in Korea

Ryoung-Eun Ko1, Dong Kyu Oh2, Sun Mi Choi3, Sunghoon Park4, Ji Eun Park5, Jin Gu Lee6, Young Tae Kim7, Kyeongman Jeon8

1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
3Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
4Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea
5Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea
6Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
7Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
8Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to: Kyeongman Jeon
E-mail:kjeon@skku.edu

Abstract

Background: There are uncertainty of lung transplantation (LT) in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who failed to recovery despite optimal management including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).
Methods: Nationwide multi-center retrospective observational study was performed with consecutive lung transplants for severe COVID-19-related ARDS in South Korea between June 2020 and June 2021. Data on patient demographics, pre-transplant and perioperative characteristics, and post-transplant outcomes were collected and compared with other LTs with ECMO bridge from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry.
Results: A total of 11 patients with COVID-19-related ARDS underwent LT at the five centers in South Korea. The median age was 60.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 57.5–62.5); six were male. At listing, all patients were supported with veno-venous ECMO. The median clinical frailty scale was 1.0 (IQR, 1.0–2.0) and three patients (27.3%) were on renal replacement therapy. All patients received rehabilitation for the median of 28.0 (IQR, 17.5–43.0) days before LT. Patients were transplanted a median of 49 days (IQR, 32–66) after ECMO cannulation. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) within 72 hours of LT was developed in two patients (18.2%). Major postoperative complications were infection in seven (63.5%) and bleeding requiring interventions in four (36.4%). One patient died 4 days after LT due to sepsis and one patient underwent re-transplant for graft failure. After a median follow up of 112 days (IQR, 97–166), 10 patients are alive and recovering well. Compared to other LTs with ECMO bridge (n=27), post-transplant outcomes including PGD and mortality were not different between the two groups. However, infection was more frequent in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS (63.6% vs. 14.8%; P=0.005).
Conclusions: LTs in patients with unresolving COVID-19-related ARDS were effective with reasonable short-term outcomes, which was similar to other LTs with ECMO bridge.