pISSN 3022-6783
eISSN 3022-7712

View

Article View

Korean J Transplant 2023; 37(Suppl 1): S38-S38

Published online November 15, 2023

https://doi.org/10.4285/ATW2023.F-6066

© The Korean Society for Transplantation

Portal hypertension after liver transplantation

Atsuyoshi Mita1, Noriyuki Kitagawa1, Yasunari Ohno1, Yuichi Masuda2, Akira Shimizu2, Koji Kubota2, Tsuyoshi Notake1, Kentaro Umemura2, Shiori Yamazaki1, Yuji Soejima1

1Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan
2Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan

Correspondence to: Atsuyoshi Mita
E-mail: mita@shinshu-u.ac.jp

Abstract

Background: Portal hypertension (PoH) after liver transplantation (LT) is a severe complication that could result in graft loss. This study aimed to clarify characteristics and evaluate the treatment outcome of PoH after LT.
Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Japan and included 309 recipients, excluding 34 patients who lost their graft within 1 year after LT.
Results: Of 309 LT recipients, 65 (21.0%) had PoH. The etiology of PoH consisted of prehepatic in 24 (36.9%), hepatic in 35 (53.8%), and posthepatic in 6 (9.2%). The 10-year survival rate was significantly lower in patients with PoH than in those without PoH (68.6% and 92.0, P<0.0001). Out of 65 patients with PoH, 30 (46.2%, Con-Tx group) could be conservatively treated by such as the use of diuretics. Other 35 (53.8%, Inv-Tx group) underwent retransplantation (n=7), operations such as splenectomy (n=4), interventional radiology (n=17), endoscopic intervention (n=4), and drainage of pleural effusion and/or ascites (n=3). The Inv-Tx group showed a significantly better 10-year survival rate than the Con-Tx group (78.4 vs. 53.3%, P=0.0049). IVR could be performed in 10 of 24 patients with prehepatic PoH (41.6%) and six of six patients with posthepatic PoH (100%), while 19 (54.3%) were only administered drugs and only 5 (14.3%) could be performed retransplantation in 35 patients with hepatic PoH. In Inv-Tx group, the graft survival rate was significantly worse in 15 patients with hepatic PoH than in 14 with prehepatic PoH and 6 with posthepatic PoH (10-year graft survival rate: 46.7%, 85.7%, and 83.3%, respectively; P=0.0131).
Conclusions: PoH in LT recipients negatively impacted patient survival. Notably, hepatic PoH was difficult to treat and showed a worse outcome. Invasive treatment for posttransplant PoH could improve patient outcomes. Thus, appropriate diagnosis and treatment selection are important.